Compare
Two claims, side by side?
Both claims are scored with the exact same transparent rubric, so their meters are directly comparable. A higher score means a larger quality-weighted share of evidence supports the claim — it is never a verdict on truth.
?
Both claims are scored with the exact same transparent rubric, so their meters are directly comparable. A higher score means a larger quality-weighted share of evidence supports the claim — it is never a verdict on truth.
Daily vitamin D supplementation prevents the common cold in the general population.
Evidence strengthNot supported · 27/100
Strongest counter (always shown)
Large randomized trial found no reduction in respiratory infections overall.
Randomized trial · n=25,000
High-dose omega-3 (EPA) lowers cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients.
Evidence strengthMixed evidence · 64/100
Strongest counter (always shown)
Randomized trial with a different formulation showed no cardiovascular benefit.
Randomized trial · n=13,000
High-dose omega-3 (EPA) lowers cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients. has the stronger evidence base (64/100 vs 27/100). Remember: this reflects the weight of evidence, not a final verdict.